Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8 Comments on: Antarctic Monkeys
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/
Trying to make a pointFri, 25 Jan 2008 12:21:35 +0000hourly1By: Rochenko
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58553
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:05:41 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58553My apologies.
]]>By: Gus Abraham
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58552
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:12:36 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58552Guy?
]]>By: Rochenko
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58551
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:28:37 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58551Good post, Guy. The main characteristics of Spiked have always been the obsessive droning repetition of favourite freemarketarian tropes, together with shoddy arguments that often grind to a halt in the midst of a flagrant contradiction.
]]>By: Planeshift
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58546
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:12:39 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58546If I recall correctly, and I may be wrong, Greenpeace doesn’t actually have charitable status. It certainly doesn’t claim gift aid on donations. If that is the case the entire Deichmann piece is an own goal.
]]>By: michael the tubthumper
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58538
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:27:05 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58538they are an extremely dodgy group of people
]]>By: G. Tingey
http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/02/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58535
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:32:45 +0000http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/02/23/antarctic-monkeys/#comment-58535It certainly looks as if this Deichmann character is a deliberate serial public liar, doesn’t it?
I could be wrong, of course, but, on the form shown so far …….