Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/01/632/ Trying to make a point Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:21:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: gabor http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/01/632/#comment-58392 Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:44:53 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/01/14/632/#comment-58392 Or a “split” in a political party (if two people disagree, or just express differing views). But then life would be a lot less fun for media, opposing parties etc.

]]>
By: Robert http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/01/632/#comment-58389 Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:30:10 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/01/14/632/#comment-58389 I think you miss the point, Clarice. Nigel is not making a meta point about the OpenDemocracy post. He is literally saying that if two people disagree, there need not be a war or a bombing to resolve the issue.

]]>
By: Clarice http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/01/632/#comment-58387 Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:17:48 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/01/14/632/#comment-58387 14. The OpenDemocracy post referred to = Statement + Disagreement.
It simply doesn’t, because you’re missing out something crucial, Nigel: it actually explains why each thing is disagreed with.
Disagreement + convincing justification does equal explosion.

]]>
By: Nigel Sedgwick http://sharpener.johnband.org/2007/01/632/#comment-58373 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:53:04 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/2007/01/14/632/#comment-58373 13: Statement plus disagreement does not equal explosion.

Best regards

]]>