Oh, and on the semantic question, I don’t think that the problem is between –phobic or –sceptic: the conflation is between Europe and the EU.
I rather like the parts of Europe that I have been to: I have had a very nice time. However, I loathe the EU; it should not exist. Further, in its present form, a vote for the EU is a vote against democratic determination.
Nosemonkey thinks that the EU can be reformed and made more democratic: I don’t. There is, as far as I can make out, the first bone of contention…
DK
]]>That’s the problem, isn’t it: most British arguments on both sides of the European debate seem to be based on emotion rather than rationalism. This means that those who do attempt to examine the issues rationally are likely to get accused by both sides of representing their opponents even when they’re do no such thing – as Nosemonkey seems to find pretty regularly.
Nice analysis, by the way.
]]>(I’d also be intrigued to know of any examples of similar complaints of the use of the word “Europhile” – a term that has been thrown at me on countless occasions, despite being demonstrably innaccurate…)
]]>I find the blogger Cranmer vaguely amusing, it must be said. His/her opinions, however, bear little or no relation to those of the historical Archbishop, who remains one of my all-time heroes.
As for the Europhobic/Eurosceptic terminology problem, sadly these days “Eurosceptic” no longer means what it should do. If it did, I’d be a Eurosceptic. Instead, it has become pretty much a synonym for Europhobic/anti-EU. Which is a great shame, and has weakened political discourse in this country significantly.
Euro/Sterling wise, there’s no way in hell I’m going to argue with Mr Band. He knows infinitely more about political economy than I ever will…
]]>