Lets not get into semantic hair-splitting on this point. You have not gone into great detail on how you would go about fixing these problems so I’ve had to surmise your stance from your tone. I’ll give you an example;
We run a stable together and your favourite horse is sick. You want to spend a lot of money on a good vet and I want to shoot it and sell the meat.
Suffice to say from my point of view you don’t want to tackle the issue – that the horse is a no-hoper. Its not an ad hominem, its semantics.
]]>That is very different from suggesting I wouldn’t like to tackle the problem.
]]>You’re quite right though – we are on a trajectory of mass extermination for deviants. Arbeit macht frei and all that.
]]>I don’t think your solutions would be in any way similar to mine. That’s all.
]]>And then to say that I wouldn’t like to tackle them… simply astonishing.
]]>However I am sad to see that you have fallen into the same trap the press did regarding Cameron’s speech and took a momentary allegorical vehicle to be the entire substance of his argument. While it wasn’t exactly inspirational it was not quite so devoid of intelligence as you have summarised.
Throwing young offenders in jail, giving them ASBOs and reformation programmes in general are rather like a doctor continually applying treatments to deal with symptoms rather than the root causes of the disease, however no politician can deal with these as they would be political suicide. I don’t think even you would like them either.
]]>