Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sharpener.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Paris is worth a Salah http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/ Trying to make a point Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:21:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: home equity line of credit http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-22595 Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:46:48 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-22595 home equity line of credit

]]>
By: Katie Bartleby http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3710 Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:29:52 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3710 To be honest, I read both in a book called “60 million frenchmen can’t be wrong” whereas the two canadian authors, of course, might be. I’ll check and get back to you.

]]>
By: Chris Williams http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3709 Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:25:24 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3709 Katie, are you sure about your idea of who pays the French police, and the nature of their evolution? I was under the impression that the Gendarmerie were formally part of the army, while the Police National, (including the CRS) are not.

]]>
By: Devil's Kitchen http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3708 Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:10:42 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3708 At the end of the day, nothing is about religion. It is always about economics.

True enough, but religion can have an effect on economics as neatly summed up here by Chris at Strange Stuff.

DK

]]>
By: Katie Bartleby http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3704 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:24:45 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3704 That’s fascinating ed… I’m very into the role that design plays in urban communities in my day job, so I might just put that one on my Xmas list…

]]>
By: Ed Teague http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3703 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:49:14 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3703 Shadrach Woods was a pupil of Corbusier and he forecast the problems, analysed their causes and effects. He had experience of urban housing in Algeria and Morocco.. and esepcailly understaood the urban probelsm of the North African diaspora.

Woods wrote the essential book (well it is for me) for understanding the modern city ,“The Man in the Street” A Polemic on urbanism, it was available in the mid – 70’s as a Penguin but no longer, the recently published Tom Avermaete, Another Modern, The Post-War Arch-itecture and Urbanism of Candilis-Josic-Woods Nai Publishers Rotterdam Paperback, 432 pages / ISBN 90-5662-473-3, € 42.00 helps put their work in perspective.

The Man in the Street is the tale of the urban space that we all, rich or poor, young or old, do inhabit at some time; where we find a place to live out our destiny in its houses , factories, offices, schools, buses, and streets. A series of questions might be asked. The question is, who shall decide, govern and profit from the machines that cities are? (Vide Corbusier “a house is a machine for living”)

There is the current answer, the national rulers. (Central Government Grants – with ring fences, targets etc.,)

Woods hoped for another possibility: The man in the street, in the city.

The question ? What will be the basis of the city system? The traditional answer is, one one hand the system of speculation and privilege, the other, disenfranchisement despair and poverty.

There could be another answer, a system of communal action and tranquillity, public service and shared amenities. The question is, what form shall the city take? The traditional answer is the centric city with power concentrations and suburban dispersal, slightly modified into a automotive megapolitan mess with peripheral power concentrations and more widespread dispersal.

Another answer might be the communal, non-hierarchical, continuous, de-centered city of integrated, close-by activities designed for human intercourse restoring neighborliness and urbanity as human pursuits. This vision is the city that Shadrach Woods described, in words and maps, and that he made in his buildings.

Read his book and the problems of the city he outlined – mainly from a French perspective with a deep knowledge of the North African diaspora – and the riots in France were foreseen 30 years ago.

Deterioration and squalor he saw as a variety of urban chaos, interacting negatively with efficiency, safety and liveability. The public realm is particularly damaged by the violence of decay and collapse: “we have been unable to create and maintain even a minimum standard of environmental decency across any of our western cities.” In addition, pollution of the public air, water and and sound-space has proceeded apace. Overcrowding is endemic in the ghettos of the poor and a common feature of middle class redoubts, (brown field site congestion, overloaded roads) adding to the forces of deterioration and abuse of every part of the urban fabric.

In a struggle for power and growth, human values become perverted: the bureaucrat becomes timid and power hungry, public service is demeaned, jobs lose their value in the interest of consumption, love of country becomes the chauvinism of the military state or the nationalism of hatred, the man in the street is disenfranchised from the planning process and is set against his neighbor in the struggle for economic power.

Woods’ description of the problems that the city was facing was a mild tonic compared to his outcry at the shortcomings of our society: a society that he saw as devoted to endless economic development – with expansion and exploitation joined together; top of the heap individualism; management by overwhelmed, unresponsive bureaucrats (Surely not ?); rabid nationalism (BNP, Le Pen, Islam); and misuse of resources on a global scale. He saw the city as the front-line battlefield in this societal system, where interest groups, ethnic or economic or both devoted the lion’s share of the worlds resources to the seizure and maintenance of their own hegemony. (Sound familiar)

On November 14th his personal Archive is being donated to Columbia University NY NY by his widow (he died in 1975) and his work celebrated with seminars, talks, and a massive exhibition.

]]>
By: Pickled Politics http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3702 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:46:59 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3702 Paris riots spread across France – who is to blame?

The riots in Paris have continued into their tenth night, and have spread to other cities in France. The country is teethering on the edge of anarchy.
In addition to setting schools, nurseries and cars on fire, some criminals did the same to a disabl…

]]>
By: Tim Worstall http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3701 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:41:51 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3701 Britblog Roundup # 38

Here ’tis my luvverlies, this week’s Britblog Roundup. As you know you can nominate posts for inclusion by simply emailing the URL to britblog AT gmail DOt com. We’re interested in what you think were the best posts of British

]]>
By: Tim Worstall http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3700 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:39:10 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3700 22% sounds about right for youth unemployment. But you can probably double that for first and second generation immigrant youth. Your 50% wasn’t too far off the mark in those suburbs that are going up in flames.

]]>
By: Temple http://sharpener.johnband.org/2005/11/paris-is-worth-a-salah/#comment-3699 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:26:30 +0000 http://www.thesharpener.net/?p=186#comment-3699 At the end of the day, nothing is about religion. It is always about economics. Even the reformation and inquisition used religion as an excuse – the reformation because certain German princes wanted to expand their “businesses” without the Pope’s interference ( cf Henry VIII) and the inquisition because the then King and Queen of Spain wanted to suppress economic activity that was weakening their power.
The same applies in France today – religion may be an excuse but its all about “wanting” things – and thats economics, not religion

Ed from Katie: Much as I would have liked to have written this, it was in fact my Dad using the same computer as me.

]]>